| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-15 20:07:54 |
| Message-ID: | 117A9FC5-AE7F-4540-B732-4483A605251F@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 15 janv. 09 à 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> This patch has annoyed me twice in two days now, and similarly with
>> other people I know. Having to type \dfS now is about the worst
>> loss of
>> usability in psql that I can recall. Can we reconsider or revert
>> this?
>
> I agree, this change mostly sucks, and particularly with respect to
> \df.
Maybe it does so much 'cause you're developing system functions. I've
yet to try it but think it's a good feature.
What about a new \dfU listing only non system objects ( User ones ) ?
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-15 20:27:29 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-15 20:03:46 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |