From: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Date: | 2005-01-06 01:37:19 |
Message-ID: | 1104975439.2886.55.camel@jeff |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
What caught my eye is the "strict mode". I wonder if they are going to
start promoting the reporting of errors? Right now MySQL seems to have
the philosophy that "if the input is wrong, it is better to do something
than nothing" (e.g. inserting Feb 31st into a date field).
Perhaps they're trying to change that philosophy slowly with this strict
mode?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 15:23 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:42:23AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote:
> > Has anyone spent any time with the MySQL 5.0 alpha, set to go into
> > beta shortly
> > (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/01/04/HNmysql5beta_1.html)?
> >
> > Would be interesting to have a rudimentary comparison checklist -
> > not so much benchmarks, as features, as they seem to have added a
> > lot. And any info on how they've implemented these features (e.g.
> > multiple table types in order to use different features, etc.) would
> > be of interest.
>
> Anybody who's interested may want to check this:
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/News-5.0.x.html
>
> There are 4 more links at the bottom of that page that will help.
>
> Cheers,
> D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-01-06 02:01:39 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-01-05 23:23:46 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |