From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Date: | 2005-01-05 23:23:46 |
Message-ID: | 20050105232346.GC11893@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:42:23AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Has anyone spent any time with the MySQL 5.0 alpha, set to go into
> beta shortly
> (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/01/04/HNmysql5beta_1.html)?
>
> Would be interesting to have a rudimentary comparison checklist -
> not so much benchmarks, as features, as they seem to have added a
> lot. And any info on how they've implemented these features (e.g.
> multiple table types in order to use different features, etc.) would
> be of interest.
Anybody who's interested may want to check this:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/News-5.0.x.html
There are 4 more links at the bottom of that page that will help.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-01-06 01:37:19 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2005-01-05 15:42:23 | MySQL 5 comparison |