| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
| Date: | 2005-01-06 02:53:52 |
| Message-ID: | 343nhvF44nqf4U1@individual.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
You're assuming that there will be some incentive to use this new
mode.
Existing applications that are rife with dependancies on existing
functionality will _break_ if they turn on "strict mode."
And what value is there in fixing them? That doesn't add new
functionality...
No, I don't see a great deal of value in this, outside of _new_
commercial users that are paying for licenses...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html
"A hack is a terrible thing to waste, please give to the
implementation of your choice..." -- GJC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2005-01-06 10:03:33 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-01-06 02:20:03 | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |