From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help with count(*) |
Date: | 2003-11-14 17:43:27 |
Message-ID: | 1068831807.2540.44.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Christopher Browne kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 16:13:
> Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com (Rajesh Kumar Mallah) wrote:
> > INFO: "profiles": found 0 removable, 369195 nonremovable row versions in 43423 pages
> > DETAIL: 246130 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> > Nonremovable row versions range from 136 to 2036 bytes long.
>
> It seems as though you have a transaction open that is holding onto a
> whole lot of old rows.
>
> I have seen this happen somewhat-invisibly when a JDBC connection
> manager opens transactions for each connection, and then no processing
> happens to use those connections for a long time. The open
> transactions prevent vacuums from doing any good...
Can't the backend be made to delay the "real" start of transaction until
the first query gets executed ?
------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-14 17:50:25 | Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-14 17:35:08 | Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-14 18:49:59 | Re: Help with count(*) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-14 16:40:42 | Re: Query question |