Re: Help with count(*)

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help with count(*)
Date: 2003-11-14 17:43:27
Message-ID: 1068831807.2540.44.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Christopher Browne kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 16:13:
> Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com (Rajesh Kumar Mallah) wrote:
> > INFO: "profiles": found 0 removable, 369195 nonremovable row versions in 43423 pages
> > DETAIL: 246130 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> > Nonremovable row versions range from 136 to 2036 bytes long.
>
> It seems as though you have a transaction open that is holding onto a
> whole lot of old rows.
>
> I have seen this happen somewhat-invisibly when a JDBC connection
> manager opens transactions for each connection, and then no processing
> happens to use those connections for a long time. The open
> transactions prevent vacuums from doing any good...

Can't the backend be made to delay the "real" start of transaction until
the first query gets executed ?

------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 17:50:25 Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-14 17:35:08 Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-14 18:49:59 Re: Help with count(*)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-14 16:40:42 Re: Query question