From: | Will LaShell <will(at)lashell(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help with count(*) |
Date: | 2003-11-14 19:40:23 |
Message-ID: | 3FB52FA7.8060508@lashell.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Hannu Krosing wrote:
>Christopher Browne kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 16:13:
>
>
>>Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com (Rajesh Kumar Mallah) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>INFO: "profiles": found 0 removable, 369195 nonremovable row versions in 43423 pages
>>>DETAIL: 246130 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
>>>Nonremovable row versions range from 136 to 2036 bytes long.
>>>
>>>
>>It seems as though you have a transaction open that is holding onto a
>>whole lot of old rows.
>>
>>I have seen this happen somewhat-invisibly when a JDBC connection
>>manager opens transactions for each connection, and then no processing
>>happens to use those connections for a long time. The open
>>transactions prevent vacuums from doing any good...
>>
>>
>
>Can't the backend be made to delay the "real" start of transaction until
>the first query gets executed ?
>
>
That seems counter intuitive doesn't it? Why write more code in the
server when the client is the thing that has the problem?
Will
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-14 19:40:47 | Re: [ADMIN] Problem with compilation 7.3.4 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-14 19:33:27 | Re: [ADMIN] Problem with compilation 7.3.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-14 20:38:46 | Re: Help with count(*) |
Previous Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2003-11-14 19:27:41 | Re: IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ?? |