From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help with count(*) |
Date: | 2003-11-14 14:13:48 |
Message-ID: | m3ad6zkpgj.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com (Rajesh Kumar Mallah) wrote:
> INFO: "profiles": found 0 removable, 369195 nonremovable row versions in 43423 pages
> DETAIL: 246130 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> Nonremovable row versions range from 136 to 2036 bytes long.
It seems as though you have a transaction open that is holding onto a
whole lot of old rows.
I have seen this happen somewhat-invisibly when a JDBC connection
manager opens transactions for each connection, and then no processing
happens to use those connections for a long time. The open
transactions prevent vacuums from doing any good...
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://cbbrowne.com/info/multiplexor.html
"Waving away a cloud of smoke, I look up, and am blinded by a bright,
white light. It's God. No, not Richard Stallman, or Linus Torvalds,
but God. In a booming voice, He says: "THIS IS A SIGN. USE LINUX, THE
FREE Unix SYSTEM FOR THE 386." -- Matt Welsh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-11-14 14:17:32 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-11-14 13:59:05 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SZŰCS Gábor | 2003-11-14 15:08:27 | constant vs function param differs in performance |
Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-11-14 13:37:55 | Re: INSERT extremely slow with large data sets (fwd) |