From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Date: | 2003-06-20 14:25:51 |
Message-ID: | 1056119151.7086.2263.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 04:41, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
> > > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
> > > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
> > >
> > > Just a thought.
> >
> > And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle
> > prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh
> > oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected
> > happens :(
> >
> >...
>
> I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of
> a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original
> delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to
> be another extension?
>
There really isn't for this release. Any talk of delay is just a thought
on general policy for future releases.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Jacobs | 2003-06-20 14:29:43 | Re: PlPython |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-20 14:14:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Subtraction carry bug in xlog.c in 7.3 and 7.4 |