| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net, chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-20 08:41:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0306200936510.29248-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
> > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
> > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
> >
> > Just a thought.
>
> And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle
> prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh
> oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected
> happens :(
>
>...
I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of
a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original
delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to
be another extension?
--
Nigel Andrews
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2003-06-20 08:53:00 | Re: tsearch V2 (Was: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze) |
| Previous Message | Christian Plattner | 2003-06-20 08:20:14 | Re: Access to transaction status |