From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "J(dot)R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Subtraction carry bug in xlog.c in 7.3 and 7.4 |
Date: | 2003-06-20 14:14:58 |
Message-ID: | 17802.1056118498@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"J.R. Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com> writes:
> The attached patches against 7.3 and 7.4 fix a subtraction carry bug in
> xlog.c.
This is simply a waste of cycles, because xrecoff can never be zero
(if it were, it'd be pointing at a page header, which is not a valid
record location). If you look around in the code, you'll note that
xrecoff==0 is actually used as an invalid-value flag in a couple of
contexts.
Can you point to anyplace where the behavior would change? If so
I think there's a deeper bug to fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-20 14:25:51 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-20 14:04:18 | Re: Access to transaction status |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nailah Ogeer | 2003-06-20 15:00:42 | Re: [HACKERS] psql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-20 14:01:15 | Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read |