From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Date: | 2002-11-21 19:22:46 |
Message-ID: | 1037906566.56165.6.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> concurrency issues. ;-)
Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-11-21 19:28:21 | Re: Welcom & a problem |
Previous Message | Mike Beachy | 2002-11-21 19:20:34 | Re: &main::execute undefined? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:30:14 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-11-21 19:18:20 | Re: xBSD shmem doc deficiency |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:30:14 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 19:14:56 | Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |