Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Date: 2002-11-21 19:22:46
Message-ID: 1037906566.56165.6.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> concurrency issues. ;-)

Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-21 19:28:21 Re: Welcom & a problem
Previous Message Mike Beachy 2002-11-21 19:20:34 Re: &main::execute undefined?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-21 19:30:14 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-11-21 19:18:20 Re: xBSD shmem doc deficiency

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-21 19:30:14 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-21 19:14:56 Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence