From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Date: | 2002-11-21 20:09:50 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211309330.23651-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > concurrency issues. ;-)
>
> Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.
Isn't that what Bruce just said? ;^)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-21 20:23:50 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | dev | 2002-11-21 19:35:41 | Re: &main::execute undefined? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-21 20:23:50 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:30:14 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-21 20:23:50 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:30:14 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |