| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
| Date: | 2002-11-21 19:14:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200211211914.gALJEuZ21767@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I deleted the first table. The sequence was deleted too, leaving the
> default of the second table referring to a non-existent sequence.
>
>
> Could this be a TODO item in 7.4, to add a dependency check when a
> sequence is set as the default without being created at the same time?
Added to TODO:
* Have sequence dependency track use of DEFAULT sequences, seqname.nextval
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:17:00 | Re: Welcom & a problem |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 19:11:08 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 19:17:02 | Re: Why an array in pg_group? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-21 19:14:44 | Re: Error when comparing an integer to an empty string. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-21 19:22:46 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 19:11:08 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |