| From: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, David De Graff <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? |
| Date: | 2002-10-16 19:06:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1034795177.1089.3.camel@miles.debisschop.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of
> Postgresql.
>
> On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?
--
Karl
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2002-10-16 19:14:25 | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? |
| Previous Message | Curtis Faith | 2002-10-16 18:08:21 | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |