Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, David De Graff <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date: 2002-10-16 19:33:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0210161322300.1431-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The slashdot article:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/14/1720241&mode=nested&tid=95

The isoc page: http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/

the isoc proposal:

http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/10-1.shtml

the Oracle post:

http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html

Good day.

On 16 Oct 2002, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of
> > Postgresql.
> >
> > On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> > > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
>
> Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?
>
> --
> Karl
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Swan 2002-10-16 19:55:14 Re: v7.3 Branched ...
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-10-16 19:25:37 Re: Postgresql and multithreading