Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, David De Graff <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date: 2002-10-16 19:14:25
Message-ID: 3DADBA91.7050302@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
>>It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of
>>Postgresql.
>>
>>On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
>>>especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
>>>PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
>>>(linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
>>>marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
>>
>
> Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?

Here's the Oracle statement:

http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html

Hope that helps,

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-10-16 19:25:37 Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Previous Message Karl DeBisschop 2002-10-16 19:06:13 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?