neha khatri <nehakhatri5(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does the community believe that the existing INFO message, as shown below,
> is clear enough for the users.
> "btree operator family "bpchar_ops" contains function
> bpcharcmp(character,character) with wrong signature for support number 1"
Well, that message is targeted at somebody who's built a btree operator
class and is testing it, so I should think it would be clear enough to
them.
regards, tom lane