On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> neha khatri <nehakhatri5(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Does the community believe that the existing INFO message, as shown
> below,
> > is clear enough for the users.
> > "btree operator family "bpchar_ops" contains function
> > bpcharcmp(character,character) with wrong signature for support number 1"
>
> Well, that message is targeted at somebody who's built a btree operator
> class and is testing it, so I should think it would be clear enough to
> them.
Sure, that clarifies.
Thanks.
Neha