Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mikhail Matrosov <mikhail(dot)matrosov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ewan_higgs(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test
Date: 2021-07-23 22:05:46
Message-ID: 1000590.1627077946@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-07-23 17:18:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we back-patch this, or just do it in HEAD? Maybe HEAD+v14?

> I'm ok with all, with a preference for HEAD+v14, followed by HEAD, and
> all branches.

After a bit more thought, HEAD+v14 is also my preference. I'm not
eager to change this in stable branches, but it doesn't seem too
late for v14.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-07-23 22:18:06 Re: Followup Timestamp to timestamp with TZ conversion
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-07-23 22:03:42 Re: Followup Timestamp to timestamp with TZ conversion