Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mikhail Matrosov <mikhail(dot)matrosov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ewan_higgs(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test
Date: 2021-07-23 21:51:42
Message-ID: 20210723215142.s3gizsq6m24frc2d@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-07-23 17:18:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not prepared to go that far just yet; but certainly we can stop
> expending configure cycles on the case.
>
> Should we back-patch this, or just do it in HEAD? Maybe HEAD+v14?

I'm ok with all, with a preference for HEAD+v14, followed by HEAD, and
all branches.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-07-23 22:03:42 Re: Followup Timestamp to timestamp with TZ conversion
Previous Message Cary Huang 2021-07-23 21:49:24 Re: CREATE SEQUENCE with RESTART option