Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mikhail Matrosov <mikhail(dot)matrosov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ewan_higgs(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test
Date: 2021-07-24 16:20:23
Message-ID: 1165059.1627143623@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> After a bit more thought, HEAD+v14 is also my preference. I'm not
> eager to change this in stable branches, but it doesn't seem too
> late for v14.

Perusing the commit log, I realized that there's another reason why
v14 is a good cutoff: thread_test.c was in a different place with
an allegedly different raison d'etre before 8a2121185. So done
that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-07-24 16:26:40 Re: CREATE SEQUENCE with RESTART option
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-07-24 16:16:02 Re: Use WaitLatch for {pre, post}_auth_delay instead of pg_usleep