| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums) |
| Date: | 2013-04-26 13:40:27 |
| Message-ID: | 10005.1366983627@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2013-04-26 13:11:00 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>>> The unresolved code issue that I know of is moving the compiler flags behind a configure check. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at that. My config-fu is weak and it would take me some time to figure out how to do that.
>> Do we necessarily have to do that before beta? If not, let's concentrate on getting the basic path in, and let's add the gcc-specific compiler options later.
> If we want them we should do it before beta, otherwise we won't notice
> problems that the flags cause (misoptimizations, problems on compiler
> versions, ...). So either now or in 9.4.
Yeah, beta1 is the point in the cycle where we have the most leverage
for discovering portability problems. We should not be leaving anything
involving configure tests as "to fix later".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-26 13:48:48 | Re: Recovery target 'immediate' |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-04-26 12:58:48 | Re: Recovery target 'immediate' |