Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)
Date: 2013-04-26 11:14:40
Message-ID: 20130426111440.GA14918@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-04-26 13:11:00 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> > The unresolved code issue that I know of is moving the compiler flags behind a configure check. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at that. My config-fu is weak and it would take me some time to figure out how to do that.
>
> Do we necessarily have to do that before beta? If not, let's concentrate on getting the basic path in, and let's add the gcc-specific compiler options later.

If we want them we should do it before beta, otherwise we won't notice
problems that the flags cause (misoptimizations, problems on compiler
versions, ...). So either now or in 9.4.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2013-04-26 11:28:07 Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2013-04-26 11:11:00 Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)