Re: Let's play bash the search engine

From: "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com>
To: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's play bash the search engine
Date: 2006-12-19 17:42:22
Message-ID: 0d1701c72395$0a9d03b0$6601a8c0@iwing
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?q=HAVING
>> says "An error occured while searching."
>
> I bet HAVING is a stop-word, so actual message is 'NOTICE: query contains
> only stopword(s) or doesn't contain lexeme(s), ignored'
>
> I think we should add to pg_dict dictionary line
>
> having having

just a though... wouldn't it make sense for a documentation search index to
*not* have stop words at all? potentially every word that is being searched
for could be contained in a query example, code piece etc and thus seems
important to me... for example keywords like AND, OR etc.

- thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2006-12-19 17:44:37 Re: Let's play bash the search engine
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2006-12-19 17:34:23 Re: Let's play bash the search engine