| From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Let's play bash the search engine |
| Date: | 2006-12-19 17:20:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0612192014520.16338@sn.sai.msu.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Filip Rembiakowski wrote:
> 2006/12/19, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>> Take a look at let us know what you think and how it performs for you.
>
> http://search.postgresql.org/search?q=HAVING
> says "An error occured while searching."
I bet HAVING is a stop-word, so actual message is
'NOTICE: query contains only stopword(s) or doesn't contain lexeme(s), ignored'
I think we should add to pg_dict dictionary line
having having
This will prevent 'having' be recognized as a stop-word by other dictionaries,
which follow pg_dict dictionary.
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2006-12-19 17:34:23 | Re: Let's play bash the search engine |
| Previous Message | Bob Pawley | 2006-12-19 17:13:45 | Re: Creating an Independant Application |