From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Let's play bash the search engine |
Date: | 2006-12-19 17:44:37 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0612192043380.16338@sn.sai.msu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Thomas H. wrote:
>>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?q=HAVING
>>> says "An error occured while searching."
>>
>> I bet HAVING is a stop-word, so actual message is 'NOTICE: query contains
>> only stopword(s) or doesn't contain lexeme(s), ignored'
>>
>> I think we should add to pg_dict dictionary line
>>
>> having having
>
> just a though... wouldn't it make sense for a documentation search index to
> *not* have stop words at all? potentially every word that is being searched
> for could be contained in a query example, code piece etc and thus seems
> important to me... for example keywords like AND, OR etc.
Ah, I forgot about them. Now, with GiN we could definitely try
stop-words free search !
>
> - thomas
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2006-12-19 17:54:14 | Re: out of memory woes |
Previous Message | Thomas H. | 2006-12-19 17:42:22 | Re: Let's play bash the search engine |