From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Date: | 2016-11-24 05:57:16 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F65A91B@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Maybe a workable compromise would be to leave the file present, and have
> the stats collector re-write it every (say) five minutes. Then I'd be okay
> with having an immediate shutdown skip writing the file; you'd be losing
> up to five minutes' worth of activity, but not going completely nuts. So
> the stats collector's normal activities would include writing the temp file
> on-demand and the permanent file on a timed cycle.
>
> The other components of the fix (deleting on PITR rewind or stats collector
> crash) would remain the same.
The manual says:
"Also, the collector itself emits a new report at most once per PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL milliseconds (500 ms unless altered while building the server). So the displayed information lags behind actual activity."
Doesn't this mean that the stats collector writes files in pg_stat_tmp/ every 500ms? If true, how about just moving those files into appropriate locations during recovery, instead of removing the files?
I also find others's ideas woth considering -- WAL-logging the stats files, type-specific stats files, etc. -- but I'm afraid those ideas would only be employed in a new major release, not in released versions. I'm asking for a remedy for a user (and potential users) who use older releases. And, I don't yet understand why patch would make the situation for existing users, and why stop writing files during immediate/abnormal shutdown requires other efforts.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-11-24 06:04:22 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-24 05:41:08 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |