From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Date: | 2016-11-22 21:15:58 |
Message-ID: | 10004.1479849358@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Well, the problem is that the stats data is not on disk while the system
> is in operation, as far as I recall -- it's only in the collector's
> local memory. On shutdown we tell it to write it down to a file, and on
> startup we tell it to read it from the file and then delete it. I think
> the rationale for this is to avoid leaving a file with stale data on
> disk while the system is running.
Maybe a workable compromise would be to leave the file present, and have
the stats collector re-write it every (say) five minutes. Then I'd be
okay with having an immediate shutdown skip writing the file; you'd be
losing up to five minutes' worth of activity, but not going completely
nuts. So the stats collector's normal activities would include writing
the temp file on-demand and the permanent file on a timed cycle.
The other components of the fix (deleting on PITR rewind or stats
collector crash) would remain the same.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-22 21:22:04 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-22 20:59:12 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |