From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Date: | 2016-11-24 06:04:22 |
Message-ID: | 306c85e9-c702-3742-eeff-9b7a40498afc@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Ashutosh,
On 2016/11/24 14:35, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I am trying to create a partitioned table with primary keys on the
> partitions. Here's the corresponding syntax as per documentation
> CREATE [ [ GLOBAL | LOCAL ] { TEMPORARY | TEMP } | UNLOGGED ] TABLE [
> IF NOT EXISTS ] table_name
> PARTITION OF parent_table [ (
> { column_name WITH OPTIONS [ column_constraint [ ... ] ]
> | table_constraint }
> [, ... ]
> ) ] partition_bound_spec
>
> IIUC, it should allow "create table t1_p1 partition of t1 (a primary
> key) ...", (a primary key) is nothing but "column_name
> column_constraint", but here's what happens
> create table t1_p1 partition of t1 (a primary key) for values from (0) to (100);
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "primary"
> LINE 1: create table t1_p1 partition of t1 (a primary key) for value...
You have to specify column constraints using the keywords WITH OPTIONS,
like below:
create table p1 partition of p (
a with options primary key
) for values in (1);
> The same syntax also suggests using table_constraints but that too doesn't work
> create table t1_p1 partition of t1 (primary key (a) ) for values
> from (0) to (100);
> ERROR: inherited relation "t1" is not a table or foreign table
>
> of course t1 is a table, what it isn't?
It's a bug. Forgot to consider RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE to an if block
in the code that checks inheritance parent relation's relkind when
creating an index constraint (primary key) on a child table. Will fix,
thanks for catching it.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-11-24 06:10:54 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-24 05:57:16 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |