Re: [DOCS] Confusing Trigger Docs.

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, neil(at)fairwindsoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Confusing Trigger Docs.
Date: 2023-11-26 19:59:02
Message-ID: 043ce4b19d6ea5d4a25955643a48a29cf754631c.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 13:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:36:34AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 14:49 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > I don't think that your proposed wording for this is an improvement.
> >
> > Well, the existing wording is impenetrable even for someone with some
> > PostgreSQL knowledge, like me.
>
> I moved the parition pagagraph to a more logical location and tried to
> clarify the new paragraph to be more targeted on the goal, patch
> attached.

I cannot tell if that covers everything that the original text (which
I failed to understand) did, but your wording makes sense to me.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2023-11-26 21:41:48 Table-space documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-25 01:07:39 Re: [DOCS] Rewording for ALTER TABLE ... ADD table_constraint_using_index