Re: [DOCS] Confusing Trigger Docs.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, neil(at)fairwindsoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Confusing Trigger Docs.
Date: 2023-11-24 18:14:11
Message-ID: ZWDn87yyRnC-5ybw@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:36:34AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 14:49 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I don't think that your proposed wording for this is an improvement.
>
> Well, the existing wording is impenetrable even for someone with some
> PostgreSQL knowledge, like me.

I moved the parition pagagraph to a more logical location and tried to
clarify the new paragraph to be more targeted on the goal, patch
attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment Content-Type Size
excluded.diff text/x-diff 2.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-24 23:02:12 Re: remove deprecated @@@ operator ?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-11-24 17:33:50 Re: [DOCS] Add example about date ISO format