| From: | Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | TODO list / why 7.0 ? |
| Date: | 2000-02-21 20:01:26 |
| Message-ID: | 00022121082604.00287@bering |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Having been away for some time I'm very anxious to see that there's a 7.0
release coming very soon. I extracted the TODO list from the CVS (latest update
February 9). The only really really big issue as I see it is referential
integrity. This is big, I admit but why going to 7.0 for this? Or is it because
it's long overdue (MSVC and stuff)?
There are other things that must have taken a lot of work, only it's not
mainstream the same way referential integrity is (PL/Perl and more). I had
hoped to find outer joins, but look forward to the next release if it will be
there.
Maybe I missed something in the TODO list or in the fixed list, but I couldn't
find VIEWs with UNIONs, which I understand would be solved by a rewrite of the
rules system.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-21 20:27:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-21 19:58:59 | Re: [HACKERS] new backslash command of psql |