Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date: 2000-02-21 20:27:12
Message-ID: 29004.951164832@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
>> Think we'll have to
>> leave it unfixed till Thomas gets back.

> That would be plenty of time to get it in for the real 7.0 release.

I don't like shipping betas with broken pg_dump; that makes life
unreasonably difficult for beta testers, if we have to force another
initdb before release. So I put in a quick hack solution: don't print
the column alias list at all unless there is a table alias. This makes
the rule's FROM clause conform to ANSI syntax. If you actually did
write
create view foo as SELECT alias FROM table table (alias);
then it will dump as
create view foo as SELECT table.realcolname AS alias FROM table;
but there's no harm done. Better solution needed but I'll let Thomas
provide it.

And now, it's 4:30 PM AST and we are outta here ... right Marc?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-02-21 20:28:28 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2000-02-21 20:01:26 TODO list / why 7.0 ?