Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?

Long Overdue ;)

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:

> Having been away for some time I'm very anxious to see that there's a 7.0
> release coming very soon. I extracted the TODO list from the CVS (latest update
> February 9). The only really really big issue as I see it is referential
> integrity. This is big, I admit but why going to 7.0 for this? Or is it because
> it's long overdue (MSVC and stuff)?
>
> There are other things that must have taken a lot of work, only it's not
> mainstream the same way referential integrity is (PL/Perl and more). I had
> hoped to find outer joins, but look forward to the next release if it will be
> there.
>
> Maybe I missed something in the TODO list or in the fixed list, but I couldn't
> find VIEWs with UNIONs, which I understand would be solved by a rewrite of the
> rules system.
>
> ************
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org