From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | "Craig Orsinger" <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: OpenOffice compile |
Date: | 2001-05-28 14:08:06 |
Message-ID: | xuyitilin21.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Craig Orsinger" <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid> writes:
> In article <200105221405(dot)f4ME5OG13140(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian"
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Off topic, but I thought this was interesting. This is information
> > about compiling OpenOffice. Hope PostgreSQL never gets to be this size:
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/build_faq.html
>
> IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only
> compiled on four or five different architectures
That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an
_exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception
handling. Very strange.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-28 14:14:55 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-28 09:11:46 | Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |