| From: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Orsinger <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: OpenOffice compile |
| Date: | 2001-05-28 16:12:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20010528121253.T9538@reptiles.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:08:06AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only
> > compiled on four or five different architectures
>
> That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an
> _exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception
> handling. Very strange.
i beleive that Mozilla suffered from a similar fate when released by
Netscape.
while i don't know alot of people using Mozilla directly, i am aware of a
number of offshoot applications that are using the base source code.
i would agree that source-suites with 10 million lines of code are rather
un-wieldy.
however, i fully support the efforts of any group that tries to make it
a more sane thing.
OpenOffice/StarOffice/whatever would be a wonderful boon to the OSS movement.
it would be nice if the database engine behind it was a full fledge SQL
system like postgres.
--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-28 16:55:00 | charin(), text_char() should return something else for empty input |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-28 16:06:16 | Re: New/old style trigger API |