Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade?

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade?
Date: 2002-02-08 16:24:27
Message-ID: xuyadukdjr8.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:

> On Friday 08 February 2002 12:44 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> > mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> > > but I'd like to make a general call to arms that this (or 7.3) should be
> > > the last release to require this.
>
> > We will never make such a commitment, at least not in the foreseeable
> > future.
>
> Why?
>
> > But to bind
> > ourselves forever to the current on-disk format is sheer folly.
>
> Certainly true. But upgradability!=bound-to-the-same-format.
>
> > And if you have to convert the datafile format then you might as
> > well dump and reload.
>
> No. Dump - reload is folly. And it doesn't always work. And that's the
> problem.

Add some unicode into it for even more fun. Bah.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-02-08 16:34:32 Re: 7.2 - changed array_out() - quotes vs no quotes
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-08 16:23:15 Database abstration layers