| From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Anton Kalauzky <kalauzky(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL encoding question |
| Date: | 2000-10-10 18:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | xuy8zrwh6uk.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Anton Kalauzky wrote:
> [Problem with sort order in RH 6.1 upgraded to 6.2 versus straight 6.2
> install]
>
> > So, do you have any idea about solving this problem? Thank you for your
> > time.
>
> This is due to the collation sequence set up in RH 6.2 when you do a
> fresh install. The upgrade doesn't touch the file in question,
> /etc/sysconfig/i18n. Copy this file as it is from the fresh RH 6.2
> install over to the upgraded RH 6.1 install and see what happens.
>
> Red Hat changed, for better or for worse, the collation in RH 6.2 and
> later to more closely conform to ISO standards.
>
> Ask on pgsql-hackers, or directly e-mail teg(at)redhat(dot)com for more
> details.
I'm reading here, and what Lamar's saying is correct.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-12 03:02:13 | Re: Char datatype |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-10 18:35:28 | Re: PostgreSQL encoding question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2000-10-10 18:51:55 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Previous Message | chris markiewicz | 2000-10-10 18:45:54 | TEXT vs VARCHAR |