From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Anton Kalauzky <kalauzky(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL encoding question |
Date: | 2000-10-10 18:35:28 |
Message-ID: | 39E36170.9F96A76C@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Anton Kalauzky wrote:
[Problem with sort order in RH 6.1 upgraded to 6.2 versus straight 6.2
install]
> So, do you have any idea about solving this problem? Thank you for your
> time.
This is due to the collation sequence set up in RH 6.2 when you do a
fresh install. The upgrade doesn't touch the file in question,
/etc/sysconfig/i18n. Copy this file as it is from the fresh RH 6.2
install over to the upgraded RH 6.1 install and see what happens.
Red Hat changed, for better or for worse, the collation in RH 6.2 and
later to more closely conform to ISO standards.
Ask on pgsql-hackers, or directly e-mail teg(at)redhat(dot)com for more
details.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2000-10-10 18:46:43 | Re: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL encoding question |
Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2000-10-10 17:22:36 | Re: foreign key question: the backend end the connection |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chris markiewicz | 2000-10-10 18:45:54 | TEXT vs VARCHAR |
Previous Message | Adam Ruth | 2000-10-10 18:34:18 | Re: Some advanced database features, are they present in PostgreSQL |