From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-24 17:05:49 |
Message-ID: | x7k71a9nv6.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "SS" == Stalin Subbiah <Subbiah> writes:
SS> We are looking into Sun V210 (2 x 1 GHz cpu, 2 gig ram, 5.8Os)
SS> vs. Dell 1750 (2 x 2.4 GHz xeon, 2 gig ram, RH3.0). database will
SS> mostly be write intensive and disks will be on raid 10. Wondering
SS> if 64bit 1 GHz to 32bit 2.4 GHz make a big difference here.
Spend all your money speeding up your disk system. If you're mostly
writing (like my main app) then that's your bottleneck. I use a dell
2650 with external RAID 5 on 14 spindles. I didn't need that much
disk space, but went for maxing out the number of spindles. RAID 5
was faster than RAID10 or RAID50 with this configuration for me.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pginfo | 2004-03-24 17:08:51 | Re: slow vacuum performance |
Previous Message | pginfo | 2004-03-24 16:49:55 | Re: slow vacuum performance |