Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux

We are looking into Sun V210 (2 x 1 GHz cpu, 2 gig ram, 5.8Os) vs. Dell 1750
(2 x 2.4 GHz xeon, 2 gig ram, RH3.0). database will mostly be
write intensive and disks will be on raid 10. Wondering if 64bit 1 GHz to
32bit 2.4 GHz make a big difference here.

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Andrew
Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:37 AM
To: 'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:05:45PM -0800, Subbiah, Stalin wrote:
> being the key performance booster for postgres. what is the preferred OS
> for postgres deployment if given an option between linux and solaris. As

One thing this very much depends on is what you're trying to do.
Suns have a reputation for greater reliability. While my own
experience with Sun hardware has been rather shy of sterling, I _can_
say that it stands head and shoulders above a lot of the x86 gear you
can get.

If you're planning to use Solaris on x86, don't bother. Solaris is a
slow, bloated pig compared to Linux, at least when it comes to
managing the largish number of processes that Postgres requires.

If pure speed is what you're after, I have found that 2-way, 32 bit
Linux on P-IIIs compares very favourably to 4 way 64 bit Ultra SPARC
IIs.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the
marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)