| From: | Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance monitor |
| Date: | 2001-03-13 15:36:25 |
| Message-ID: | x6d7blu1dy.fsf@thor.candleweb.no |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> My idea is that they can telnet into the server machine and do remote-X
> with the application. Just set the DISPLAY variable and it should work.
>
Well, actually you would want to tunnel your X session through ssh if
security of the database server is of any importance... But this works
fine on high bandwidth connections, but X is a real pain if you are sitting
with low bandwidth(e.g. cellphone connection when you're in the middle of
nowhere on your favorite vacation ;-)
regards,
Gunnar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-13 15:49:29 | Re: Re: Performance monitor' |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-13 15:32:24 | Re: Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch? |