Re: Re: Performance monitor'

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
Cc: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Performance monitor'
Date: 2001-03-13 15:49:29
Message-ID: 200103131549.KAA13676@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> writes:
>
> > > > Small question... Will it work in console? Or it will be X only?
> > >
> > > It will be tck/tk, so I guess X only.
> >
> > That's bad. Cause it will be unuseful for people having databases far away...
> > Like me... :-((( Another point is that it is a little bit strange to have
> > X-Window on machine with database server... At least if it is not for play,
> > but production one...
>
> Well, I use X all the time over far distances - it depends on your
> connection... And you are not running an X server on the database server, only
> an X client.

Yes, works fine.

> But I agree that it would be nice to have monitoring architecture that
> allowed a multitude of clients...

Right now, pgmonitor is just 'ps' with some gdb/kill actions. If I add
anything to the backend, you can be sure I will make it so any app can
access it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-13 15:52:27 Re: problem with fe/be protocol and large objects
Previous Message Gunnar R|nning 2001-03-13 15:36:25 Re: Performance monitor