| From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 16 parameter limit |
| Date: | 2002-04-05 23:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | web-1050957@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
Tom,
> Seems like a good idea in the abstract ... but the hard question is
> what
> are you willing to see *not* get done in order to put cycles on
> plpgsql.
> And there's not a large supply of cycles.
Well, it's back to the idea of raising money, then.
-Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-04-06 00:08:02 | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-04-05 23:51:00 | Re: Suggestion for optimization |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-04-06 00:43:08 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 23:33:59 | Re: 16 parameter limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-04-06 05:35:49 | Re: 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 23:50:16 | Re: intersect performance (PG 7.1.3 vs 7.2) |