From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 16 parameter limit |
Date: | 2002-04-06 05:35:49 |
Message-ID: | 3CAE8935.9020503@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>
>>However, we also want to support users who are porting their PL/SQL
>> applications, which may not be easily translated into %rowtype
>> paramters.
>
> Well, probably the $64 question there is: what is Oracle's limit on
> number of parameters?
According to the Oracle 9 documentation the limit for number of
parameters to a function is 64K.
--Barry
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-06 07:27:18 | RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate |
Previous Message | Ken Hirsch | 2002-04-06 03:48:57 | Re: Suggestion for optimization |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ed Loehr | 2002-04-06 06:15:05 | Re: 7.2 fe-exec.c patch to PQescapeString() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-06 03:46:46 | Re: new food for the contrib/ directory |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | d_nardini | 2002-04-06 09:49:16 | Re: intersect performance (PG 7.1.3 vs 7.2) |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-04-05 23:51:35 | Re: 16 parameter limit |