| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |
| Date: | 2025-04-07 17:24:20 |
| Message-ID: | v7lxxsq2aruhufmf6cva4stovh2miaxfa3ywjyc4lo2ozx2gsv@7mdxkk556cng |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-04-04 19:07:12 +0200, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> They actually look good to me. We've discussed earlier dropping
> s/numa_//g for column names (after all views contain it already) so
> they are fine in this regard.
> There's also the question of consistency: (bufferid, page_num,
> node_id) -- maybe should just drop "_" and that's it?
> Well I would even possibly consider page_num -> ospagenumber, but that's ugly.
I'd go for os_page_num.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2025-04-07 17:24:27 | Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-04-07 17:20:21 | pgsql: Allow NOT NULL constraints to be added as NOT VALID |