| From: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |
| Date: | 2025-04-04 17:07:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAKZiRmyxQvXp8LHBWyXXoD1iUWK8gNRVB1ZJSnoyc8gCi6JWBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:36 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
Hi Tomas,
> Do you have any suggestions regarding the column names in the new view?
> I'm not sure I like node_id and page_num.
They actually look good to me. We've discussed earlier dropping
s/numa_//g for column names (after all views contain it already) so
they are fine in this regard.
There's also the question of consistency: (bufferid, page_num,
node_id) -- maybe should just drop "_" and that's it?
Well I would even possibly consider page_num -> ospagenumber, but that's ugly.
-J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitrios Apostolou | 2025-04-04 17:11:31 | [PATCH] parallel pg_restore: move offset-building phase to before forking |
| Previous Message | Dimitrios Apostolou | 2025-04-04 16:55:44 | Re: [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward |