Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD

From: Michael Graff <explorer(at)flame(dot)org>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Lo <jwlo(at)ms11(dot)hinet(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD
Date: 1999-03-08 02:05:30
Message-ID: v6ogm44txx.fsf@kechara.flame.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:

> On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I will pursue fixing things that way in the 6.5 sources. In the
> > meantime, do we want to check Kevin's fixes into REL6_4, or is adding
> > int8 support for more machines too low-priority to justify taking any
> > chance of breaking 6.4.3?
>
> Note that I commited int8 fixes to the v6.4.3 tree, and they are in the
> current beta3 tar file...did this mid-last week...

Did you also change the #ifdef line to include __NetBSD__ for the %qd
format? At least NetBSD/i386 uses that. Alpha might not, I'm not
fully certain, but I think it will work with %qd.

--Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-03-08 02:08:38 Re: Sunos 5.6 ,SUN C compiler 4.2,postgresql-6.4.2
Previous Message Michael Reifenberger 1999-03-08 00:15:46 Typeidentifying not working sometimes?