Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD

Try what I just commited now...its only in v6.5 sources though...

I've modified it so that it checks for use of %lld, and if that fails,
check for use of %qd, before it falls back to our homebrew snprintf...

On 7 Mar 1999, Michael Graff wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > I will pursue fixing things that way in the 6.5 sources. In the
> > > meantime, do we want to check Kevin's fixes into REL6_4, or is adding
> > > int8 support for more machines too low-priority to justify taking any
> > > chance of breaking 6.4.3?
> >
> > Note that I commited int8 fixes to the v6.4.3 tree, and they are in the
> > current beta3 tar file...did this mid-last week...
>
> Did you also change the #ifdef line to include __NetBSD__ for the %qd
> format? At least NetBSD/i386 uses that. Alpha might not, I'm not
> fully certain, but I think it will work with %qd.
>
> --Michael
>

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org