Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?

From: "Jim Wilson" <jimw(at)kelcomaine(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Will Trillich" <will(at)serensoft(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Date: 2004-04-20 05:35:51
Message-ID: twig.1082439351.13130@kelcomaine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane said:

> Will Trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com> writes:
> > is there some way of getting a look at tom's or marc's filters? i could
> > sure use a bit of help there. lordy, we're close to drowing in the
> > stuff!
>
> Tell me about it :-(
>
> I currently use four levels of filtering:
>
> 1. DNSBL lists: blackholes.five-ten-sg.com, bl.spamcop.net, relays.ordb.org
> (there are others out there, but these seem to have a good impedance
> match to my personal spam load).
>
> 2. Private blacklist of IP ranges that have sent me too much spam.
> sendmail has a pretty easy mechanism to support this, although it
> only seems to support /8 /16 or /24 ranges which is a bit coarse.
> (If you've gotten a "Go away spammer" bounce from me, you were caught
> by this filter --- let me know and I'll tighten the ranges.)
>
> 3. I have noticed that bouncing any machine that sends "HELO
> sss.pgh.pa.us" gets rid of a ton of spam and viruses. I don't know of
> any real clean way to do this, but I have a sendmail.cf hack for it.
>
> 4. Very long list of procmail filters on header and body patterns.
>
> #2 and #4 are fairly personal, in the sense that they have a decent
> success/failure ratio for the junk mail I get. I wouldn't recommend
> that someone else try my lists, and in any case they take a heck of a
> lot of hand maintenance. I've been looking into more automated methods
> such as CRM114 but haven't made the jump yet.

Yes they sure are. I tried my personal blacklist on a client's server one
time after they complained of seeing dozens a minute slipping by. It did just
about nothing, but it got them started on their own. #3 looks interesting
though...

Best regards,

Jim Wilson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith C. Perry 2004-04-20 05:42:41 Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-20 05:06:18 Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?